Tag: psychology

The Psychology of Interior Design with Amanda Greaves

Today on the Edge of Innovation, we are talking with Amanda Greaves of Amanda Greaves and Company, an interior design firm on the North Shore of Boston.

Show Notes

Amanda Greaves’ Website: www.agcinteriors.com

Find Amanda Greaves and Company on Facebook

Contact Amanda Greaves Here

Link to SaviorLabs’ Free Assessment

Sections

What Does a Designer Do?
Understanding a Client’s Taste
How Psychology Helps Designers
How Checklists Help
Asking the Right Questions
Dealing With Resistance

The Psychology of Interior Design

Paul: Hello, everyone. This is Paul Parisi with the Edge of Innovation podcast, and we’re here today with Amanda Greaves of Amanda Greaves and Company. So not the whole company here, just Amanda. Are you a figurehead or do you actually do work?

Amanda: Both.

Paul: You do? So you’re both a fig— that’s a good answer. So what does Amanda Greaves and Company do?

Amanda: We are an interior design firm, and we are all of two and a half strong.

Paul: What do you mean half?

Amanda: We have a small dog named Daisy. And that is my associate’s dog. But we do interior design for residential, hospitality, and commercial projects.

Paul: Okay. And how long have you been doing that as Amanda Greaves and Company?

Amanda: As my company, I started it. Yeah. I started my company in 2010, but I’ve been practicing design since about 2002.

What Does a Designer Do?

Paul: Okay. We have a pretty eclectic group of people who listen from very technical people to just ordinary persons off the street. Or strange people too, I’m sure,and unordinary. Whatever. So you do interior design. Does that mean you come to my house and tell me what curtains I need to pick?

Amanda: It’s a little bit more involved than that. So from a design perspective…Let me put it this way. There’s a lot of “designers” out there — and I use that with air quotes — that call themselves “designers” and they are more of a decorator. So the decorators—

Paul: Okay. So there’s a differentiation here.

Amanda: There is. Decorators are, by any stretch, they are just as important as everybody else on the team, but from a decorating perspective, you’re talking more about the furniture and the pillows and the window treatments and such. From a design perspective, I prefer to get in at the early stages of the planning stages and, with the education and the experience and the certification that we have as designers, specifically, we have the ability to — not physically but on paper — move walls and create plans and create lighting layouts. And we select a lot of the hard finishes. So for us, I look at design from how we do it, is everything that’s physically connected to the interior of a building, if you were to pick it up and shake it, everything that falls out, such as chairs and accessories and stuff, that’s more on the decorating end. And for me, the design aspect is everything that’s still physically attached.

Paul: Okay. Now how does that…? We just recently interviewed Ben Nutter.

Amanda: He’s an architect out of Topsfield.

Paul: Yeah. How does that mesh with what an architect does?

Amanda: So architects are more inclined to deal with the entire structure itself. So they do a lot of the exterior. They deal with foundations, you know, a lot more of the code aspects for clearances and references. They deal more with the town when they do for permitting.

Paul: Yeah. Ben covered that and talked about that.

Amanda: Yeah. So there are a lot of occasions where architectural firms and design firms, where their services overlap. So there are some architects that just create the vanilla box, if you will. So they will make sure that you have your subfloor, your walls are up. There’s plaster on the wall, and you have a ceiling above you. And then the designer comes in and adds everything else.

Paul: Really? You mean, so the wall, the floor coverings…?

Amanda: Yep. So we would add the hardwood flooring, all of the trim. So your baseboard, your crown moldings, whether you’re carpeting, the paint colors on the wall, all of that. But there’s a lot of architects that like to take it even further, and they will do the majority of the hardscape that’s physically attached and leave things like the fixtures — such as plumbing, lighting, decorative accessories — to the designer.

Paul: So it sounds like it’s very collaborative.

Amanda: It needs to be. It needs to be, because if I as a designer have a vision for, let’s just say, a living room, and I want a grand piece of artwork over the fireplace, and the architect coordinates with the HVAC guy to put some sort of a ducting right above the fireplace, that’s not going to work with my art.

Understanding A Client’s Taste

Paul: Okay. So now as we get into this, I’m thinking about…we’ve already talked about design versus decorating and the ordinary person on the street understands that now, but probably wouldn’t have 10 minutes ago. It wouldn’t have been as stark as it is, maybe, to you because you work on it every day. So how do you deal with…You must work with the client, the ultimate user of the facility or the room, or whatever it is. How do you deal with their taste? I mean, because do you get to know them or do you look at what they like? It just seems like a tremendous… It’s like, how do you pick a dress for somebody? How do you pick a shirt for somebody?

Amanda: Yep. So one of the benefits that I find be working as an interior designer, the people that are fortunate enough to hire us — whether it’s in a residential aspect or a lot of commercial buildings, the clients that have hired us are more focused on their business, and they just want to make sure that where they’re working is aesthetically pleasing, and they just show up, and it’s all done, and it’s great.

In order to understand the taste of a client, we have a lot of checklists. So, lots of times, clients will come to me with an idea, and they’ll say, “I’m traditional,” “I’m very contemporary,” “I’m eclectic,” “I have no idea,” or, “I think I like Shaker style houses,” but what they’re really referring could be Craftsman style.

So for me as a designer, my initial job is to do a little bit of a psychological understanding. Who are you? How quickly can you make decisions? Is it you, or is it you and your partner? Is it you and your family? Are there multiple investors involved in the project looking at it from a commercial or a hospitality standpoint?

So before I give anybody answers to anything, I need to understand who the players are. I do a little bit of a personality assessment, and they may come to me with a completely blank slate, and say, “I don’t know what to do.”

And then I’ll start asking, “How many people in your family? How many people in your office? Do you have pets? Does it matter? What do you plan on doing in your kitchen? Do you like to cook, or do you eat out all the time?”

So the answers to those questions start to create the scope of how large the rooms need to be, the style that we’re looking for. We worked with one commercial client, and he was a bit of a Renaissance man, and his concept was more contemporary and streamlines, but he wanted to have the softer aspects of it. So we did a typical cubical, but it had a wood cap on the top instead of doing it like you would assume an office building would be like. And we added some rustic accents for furniture and such in the larger areas.

Paul: And then, so you did this. You delivered it. What did he say?

Amanda: He loved it.

Paul: So, was he able to identify the little subtleties that you added in, or did it just work for him?

Amanda: For him specifically, I was actually — oddly enough that I used him as an example — he came to me, and he said, “Amanda, if I had been able to do this myself, I couldn’t have done it better,” which for me, was one of the best compliments I’ve ever gotten. Not every client says that. Not every project goes smoothly in the sense of you think you know someone when it gets started, and then when you really get into it three months, four months, 12 months down the line, there’s, “Oh, I forgot to tell you this.” Or, “Oh, by the way, this is what we’re doing, and the scope my change.” I’m fortunate when some clients have the ability to see what I see beyond me having to put it on paper.

Paul: You mean “see,” understand what your vision is.

How Psychology Helps Designers

Amanda: Yeah. And again, it’s a matter of me interpreting what they are interested in seeing for themselves and then me telling it back to them. So how I interpret it may not be the say way as you would interpret it. For example, I had a client, multiple different investors in this project, and he said, “I don’t like blue.”

Paul: That’s a pretty big color to rule out.

Amanda: It’s a pretty big color and I had to figure out the reasons why, and was it a specific blue. Is it teal that he thinks is blue? Is he colorblind? Does he just not like the feeling because it was in his grandmother’s house or something like that? And so I have to dig. I have to dig to be able to find the answers.

Paul: Was that as easy as saying, “Well, why?” Did you ask him that blunt a question?

Amanda: Yeah. “Why not?”

Paul: Yeah. And what did he say?

Amanda: “I just don’t like it.”

Paul: “I just don’t like it.”

Amanda: And then that goes into…I have a minor in psychology.

Paul: Okay. I was going to ask that. So when you do this sort of psychoanalysis, do they have… Do you have a couch? Do they lay down?

Amanda: There are times where I wish I was laying on the coach asking the questions.

Paul: Or is it just sort of part of your understanding of the interaction? Or do you actually have a checklist that you might go on? You know, go in the back room and check out. Okay, he’s crazy. He doesn’t like blue. So how formal is it? I mean, it might be, in your mind, very formal, but I might never perceive it if I’m sitting down with you.

How Checklists Help

Amanda: When I started my business seven years ago, I created every checklist under the sun because, as an entrepreneur, I wanted to make sure that if I was doing this, I was doing it right. And I started my business plan in 2009, and it’s still not done.

Paul: Of course not.

Amanda: Because, as anybody listening that’s an entrepreneur, they’ll understand the evolution of self along with the evolution of your business. And so to finish it would have been grand, but I needed to make money. So I had all the checklists, and I went out, and I got my clients, and I realized that, even if you have a checklist of 10, 15, 30 items, every single person you deal with has a very different personality. So it’s a matter of being able to think quickly on your feet, adjust the conversation as it flows, being able to, to change your aspect of questioning, you know, your line of questioning, if he clearly tells you that he doesn’t like blue, and there’s no reason for you to know anything else. So, you know, you have to kind of, okay, “Well, do you like red?”

Paul: Right. I see.

Amanda: But the checklists, I have them. I think I used them within the first six months. When I have new employees come and work with me, I have them look them over so they understand why.

Paul: It’s probably internalized by now for you.

Amanda: By now, it’s more just… My name is on that door, and so the representation of myself is who I am as a person. So my ability to communicate with your clients, whether they’re new or potentially new or I’ve had them for three or four years, is creating that dialog where we can understand each other. And that, for me, is more important than figuring out exactly what they want from the first meeting.

Paul: Right. Of course, because you want to be able to have something that’s durable, which is that relationship.

Amanda: The relationship. Exactly.

Paul: So did you specifically get a minor in psychology because you knew you’d be being this?

Amanda: No, no.

Paul: So that seems very, very exciting or serendipitous.

Amanda: It’s very serendipitous. I actually just spoke at Endicott on sometime last week to one of their graduate classes. And there were half a dozen students that are in career changing mode. One was an English major with a business minor. There was a stay-at-home mom that had studied design 15 years ago. There was a woman coming from advertising. There was another woman with a psychology minor, and there was another one who was actually a designer, interior designer minor, and she just carried through to the graduate class.

And all of those fields in life are very important for the interior design aspect. So I was able to speak to every one of them individually as I was talking about the overall encompassing facts of my business. So having the psychology minor was more, “Hey, I think I’m interested in this.” And I didn’t realize the value of it until I really started working in the industry back in 2002. But not until I genuinely started by own business did I really see the value of it.

Paul: Well it sounds like there’s a lot of things, certainly in interior design that are subject to interpretation. It’s not like, did you move the bricks from point A to point B? No, I mean, it’s not quantifiable like that. So that’s fascinating. I think that all our listeners could take a good notion there, that you need to think about psychology in anything you do. I mean, I really… It’s obvious once you say it. But, you need to be deliberate about that.

So were the checklists, were they psychological checklists or were they, “Do you like brick, or do you like carpet?”

Asking the Right Questions

Amanda: Well, there are still some checklists that I use, and it is a matter of, for example, if we’re doing a master bathroom, there are certain questions I need to ask my clients. One of the first ones, which sometimes get interpreted a little strangely, but, “What do you do in here?” You know, if somebody comes to me and says, “I want to redesign my master suite,” okay great.

“What do you guys do in here? What’s the purpose of this room?” It could very well be they have three kids and two dogs, and on Saturday mornings, this is where cartoons happen, and they want to be able to have hot chocolate and a Keurig without having to go downstairs, and they want a fireplace because this is where they spend all of their family time.

Or it could be the complete opposite. It’s a very hardworking couple. And they value their time and their private spaces to do what they do. So asking those types of questions, you get to know people very quickly as to who they are and how they live their lives. But the checklists specifically are, we need to talk about plumbing fixtures, tiles, light fixtures.

Paul: I see. Reminders of the litany.

Amanda: Which creates the scope of what we need to do.

Dealing with Resistance

Paul: So have you, in asking these questions, have you ever met resistance or friction with people?

Amanda: Yes. And usually, if that happens within our initial meeting — because I don’t charge for initial meetings because it’s more me asking question after question. Let me figure out how you are. If I meet with resistance, and if the chemistry isn’t there between myself and a potential new client, we assess the situation. We understand whether they will be good for us just as much as we could potentially be good for them. And in situations where I have felt that it wasn’t going to be a good fit, I will refer them to another designer or another firm.

The Seven Psychological Principles of Persuasive Design

On Episode 20 of the Edge of Innovation, we discuss the psychology of design with researcher and author Victor Yocco. Learn more about Victor and his new book Design for the Mind, here: http://www.victoryocco.com/

Show Notes

Learn More about Victor Yocco
Download Victor’s new book: “Design for the Mind”
(Psssst! At checkout, enter code “39yocco” for a 39% discount!)

Transcript

Introduction

Paul: This is the Edge of Innovation, Hacking the Future of Business. I’m your host, Paul Parisi.

Today we have the pleasure of speaking with design researcher and author Victor Yocco about his new book Design for the Mind: Seven Principles of Persuasive Design. Over the next few episodes we’re going to explore the principles taught in Victor’s book and really try to get to the heart of psychology and web design. Victor, welcome.

Paul: Alright. I’m going to test you a little bit here. There’s seven psychological principles of persuasive design. Can you name the seven?

Victor: I can try to. Yeah, I think I can. It hasn’t been that long since I finished writing it. So it was something that was on my mind at all times. So first, I would lead with saying that I don’t feel like you need to use them all. And I certainly don’t think that somebody needs to try to follow them perfectly. I definitely think that they are pick-and-choose and use pieces and parts.

So, the way I came up with the principles, though, and the order that wrote about them in, there is planned behavior, which is really talking about the decisions people make when they’ve got information and they’re thinking about maybe making a big purchasing decision or something that’s sort of well thought out. And that comes from what’s referred to in the academic literature as the theory of planned behavior. And it’s a very popular psychological principle that looks at health behavior a lot when it’s being researched. Like, how do people try to quit smoking? How do people try to lose weight if they are more, really, obese? What are things that motivate people to either engage in certain behaviors or not? And so that’s one of the principles.

And then I followed that up with one that’s sort of the opposite, which is how do people make split decisions, or what’s often called risky decisions, where you don’t know…the outcome isn’t guaranteed. You don’t know. There’s a percent involved. So a lot of that research comes out of economics and behavioral economics. Like, when do people determine it’s good to gamble their money or play the lottery?

And that’s really one of the lines of research and one of the principles that fascinates me the most, because it gets into this whole realm of what’s called heuristics or mental shortcuts. And basically, it’s tools and techniques that people use to make decisions quickly when they either don’t have all the information or it’s not something that they view as being worth dedicating all their thinking resources to. And there’s dozens of heuristics that can be applied to design. And it’s things like people value a loss more than they value a gain. And so they are constantly risk averse, or they want to avoid a loss. And so how can you—

Paul: By “value,” do you mean attach a higher significance to a loss?

Victor: Yeah. Yeah. So, like, if you lost five dollars, you would feel worse than the incremental level of joy you would experience if you found five dollars. So, you would want to avoid losing something much greater than the act of gaining something would promote behavior. And so that’s where concepts like double or nothing come around. Because somebody loses something, they’re willing to risk something to just try to get back to what they view as even.

Or there’s the… There’s dozens of heuristics. Another one that I really like is called the sunk cost fallacy, or also there’s another term for it, but it slips my mind right now.

Paul: That’s okay.

Victor: What it is though, is people attach a high value to something that they’ve been involved in for a long per of time, even once it has stopped giving them back their return on investment. A real life situation would be something like a relationship that’s going bad. Some people have a lot of trouble leaving bad relationships because they look at the past and they say, “Look at all this time I’ve invested.” And where, from an economic standpoint, what they should be doing is saying, “I need to cut my losses and move forward.” But from an emotional and a not looking at all the facts as being equal, the way economics researchers would say a rational person would, they say, “Oh, but you know, I would lose all this time I spent.”

How that translates to things in the design and in the technology world is that a lot of projects that were originally budgeted and scoped at a certain length of time and a certain dollar amount, quickly becomes obvious that they’re going to go over budget in a lot of ways. And people can justify hanging on to these projects that lose a lot of money. And it’s because they say, “Well, we’ve already invested four years. If we cut the losses now, what will that mean? All that four years and all that money that we spent is for nothing.” But in reality, it might truly be more valuable for you to say, “Okay. And as of today, we’re done spending any money or time on this. We’re going to cut our losses, and we’re going to shift towards a project that is going to be more financially or valuable for our time.”

Paul: Well, let me ask a question about that. So, many times, the reason people put, let’s say, in retrospect, good money after bad is because they can’t see the future. You brought out the concept of a project or a technology project, and there are factions in that. One faction is saying, “Well, if you just give us another six months, we’ll have it done for you.” And that’s another contributory message that’s coming in in the heuristics, because you’ve invested four years. “Give us another six months. Give us another six months.” I mean, that happened, probably, eight times in a four-year project.

So, what leads, what psychological principles…? Is it just simple the sunk cost fallacy or are there other things that edge into that?

Victor: There are definitely… So, another concept is that people tend to cash out gains much quicker because they want the guaranteed win, and hang on to losses in the hopes that it will turn around. And while I think it’s similar, there’s a slight difference, which is that if the comparison were that the project was being profitable, that it’s something that people would possibly then move away from quicker, because they would say, “Look, I’m making money off of this venture. It’s time for me to start something new. And this was a success.” And also, the fact that it’s guaranteed. So, again, that sort of brings in the risk aversion or the loss aversion, which is to say, “I don’t want to stick around long enough to where this is going to turn into the potential for a loss. I want to take my five dollars and run because now I’ve gained something. But if I lose this money, I’m going to feel really bad.” And so it’s wanting to avoid that.

But there’s also other things. So I think that in terms of, like, the principles that I write about, the two that we’ve spoken about so far are very much related to how individuals make their own decisions based on the information they have.

And I wrote about one more, which is called Fogg’s Behavioral Model, and that is a fairly simple concept. And BJ Fogg is a professor out of Stanford, and Stanford has a good lab called the Persuasive Technology, or I think they call it captology Lab. And that’s a word meant to mean persuasive technology. But BJ Fogg talks about and explores with his research how technology can be used to help change behaviors and persuade people to engage in different behaviors, and he identified — and I think this is really…it pinpoints what you said as being so simple it’s obvious, but you don’t know it until somebody else tells you, or… So, it’s sort of like, maybe in academic, it’s whoever gets there and writes about it first gets to take the credit, or whoever just takes credit the loudest gets to take the credit.

But it is… His concept, his model, is that there is sort of these three things that go into somebody’s decision to engage in a behavior. And it’s motivation — so, how motivated are you? Is it something that you’re really excited to do? Or is it something that you’re dreading?

Your ability — so, are you capable of doing it? An example I like to give is something like, maybe it’s buying a luxury car. You might be super motivated to do it, but if you’re bank account is at zero and you have bad credit, you might have zero ability at the time to do it. So, there’s those two.

And then, his model posits that when motivation and ability reach a certain point, that’s when you need to introduce the trigger or the call to action. So, if it were buying a luxury car, it would be, I’m super motivated. My ability is to either save money or secure a loan. So you have to understand what point I’m at. Maybe if I can’t secure a loan, then it’s saving money. And so if I walked into a car dealership with zero dollars and a lot of motivation, them presenting me with the “Do you want to buy this luxury car?” is a trigger that’s going to fail because I’m not going to end up having the ability. But if they say, “Here’s a loan that will allow you to increase your ability to afford this car,” then my ability and my motivation might be at the right place. And when they say, “And now do you want to buy this?” I can say, “Yes.”

Another way of translating that into a digital setting is sort of just like the “Buy now.” Or you don’t want to necessarily present somebody “Buy now,” until you’ve told them why. And that’s going to be increasing their motivation, and then the “Buy now” has to be presented in a way that’s clear and effective and shows somebody that they’re capable of doing it. And that’s the ability part. And then, at the right time.

So, you really have to study your users’ behaviors in saying how motivated are they coming in? Is this a product that people are dreading? Or is a product that most people are really dying to buy? And then, so how can we enable them?

Digital, actually, is an enabler in itself, you know. Somebody who wants a product really badly but it’s on another continent and it’s sitting in a store, they might never know about it. However, if you’re delivering that product through a digital interface and saying, “Look. This is sitting on the shelf in an entirely different country, but you can have it shipped tomorrow. Buy now,” that’s when the effective digital interface really presents these opportunities that maybe other mediums don’t afford, which, you know, is sort of the cool thing about designing for digital context.

So there’s that. That’s the third principle. And then I move towards the real influential and persuasion through other people, through groups and through influence of social settings. So, there’s a chapter that’s on what’s called social influence and social identity, where it really is how are people perceiving the people around them or famous people. Where are famous people doing? How are they going about doing things that you would like to emulate?

And there’s a lot of literature out there that says one of the key concepts for social influence, or for influence, is reciprocity. And that’s when people give you something or when you give somebody something, then it creates this sense of obligation that they would give you something back. And if you think about that on like the level of a birthday present, you give birthday presents, usually, to people who have given you a present on your birthday. Or you would sort of think, oh, it’s not poor taste for me to not give a birthday present to somebody who has given me a birthday present. Or, you know, something maybe even less devious would be like, if you gave me a ride to the airport next week, then I would be certainly happy to give you a ride when you call me the next time you need one.

So, how do we do that in a digital setting? You see in things like, “Here’s a free pdf of this content that you’re going to find valuable. Oh, but if you’d to have it, I’d really like you to give me your email address so that I can add you to my mailing list.” Or, “Here is a free 30-day trial of my product, and now I would like to present you with the opportunity to purchase it, rather than going on and getting a free trial of my competitor’s product or trying that.”

So, there’s a lot of ways to create this sense of reciprocity in people who are potentially interested in your product. And that’s something that I think also is something that we see when we think of like sales. And so you have to sort of be careful in how you engage in these things to not come across as overly salesy.

My Kingdom for a Font!

Do you know the difference between an m-dash and an n-dash? What about a hyphen? Differences such as these are probably perceived by your eyes and brain on a daily basis, and they affect the nature of how you process content- but it is unlikely that you spend considerable time pondering their intricacies. When choosing a font, it is critical that you consider these factors. Every letter and curve tells its own story in beautiful art that deserves respect.

Continue reading

© 2026 Paul Parisi

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑