Tag: links

Is SEO Always Worth It?

On Episode 89 of The Edge of Innovation, we’re talking with SEO expert Jeremiah Smith. He’s answering the question “Is SEO always worth it?”

Sections

How Fresh Should Your Content Be?
Accuracy of Content to Searcher Intent
Commercial Intent
When SEO Fails Expectations
Three Parts of SEO: Technical, Content, and Link Building
Developing a Content Calendar
SEO Doesn’t Have To Take a Long Time
Go At Your Own Pace With SEO
Is SEO Always Worth it?
Call To Action
How To Call Customers To Action
Tools For Marketing Automation
Closing
More Episodes
Show Notes

Is SEO Always Worth It?

How Fresh Should Your Content Be?

Paul: Welcome to another edition of The Edge of Innovation. Today we’re talking with Jeremiah Smith with Simple Tiger. He’s the founder and CEO. So, you’re an SEO company.

Okay. So, you talked about this content as being key. So, an SEO plan – is this fair to say? – an SEO plan without content is not an SEO plan?

Jeremiah: Yes. Insofar as Google is concerned, that’s correct. I would say that that could be a broad descriptor of SEO as well because of Amazon clearly needing content, iTunes search needing some content. But yeah. Generally speaking, you’re absolutely right. If you don’t have content in your SEO plan, then you just don’t have an SEO plan.

Paul: Okay, then how fresh does that content have to be?

Jeremiah: That really depends actually. Freshness is a powerful tool where the content needs to be fresh. But if we think about who has dominated Google search results for the longest time, that’s Wikipedia. And a lot of the content in Wikipedia, though it is user generated and created and optimized and it gets updated frequently and stuff like that, there are pages of content in Wikipedia that have kind of sat there for a long period of time and consistently dominate.

Paul: Good point.

Jeremiah: So, we need to keep that in mind. I’m sure if we searched for The Declaration of Independence in Google, and we read it now – its’s probably on Wikipedia – it’s probably not much different than it was five to ten years ago. It may have changed a little bit but the freshness of that does not corelate to how well it ranks.

Paul: Sure.

Jeremiah: So, freshness is important but it’s a system of factors. It is almost kind of like saying something like, “Why do you like vanilla ice cream?” or, “Why do you like jazz?” That’s hard to answer, right?

Paul: Right. Yeah.

Jeremiah: It’s a system of feelings. It’s a system of things in you that cause you to make that decision. With Google, it’s not so much feeling but there are a lot of factors that are influencing it, and in varying degrees, that aren’t outwardly published by Google. They don’t give their full science away. They give an idea of their science away, so we have an idea. But we’re constantly reverse engineering to kind of nail that down.

Accuracy of Content to Searcher Intent

Jeremiah: If I were to give you my list of top-ranking factors, kind of reverse engineered, from what I’ve discovered through doing this, the first one on that list would probably be Accuracy of Content to Searcher Intent. So, accuracy of the piece of content that you have to the searcher’s intent to the keyword that they searched. So that’s really hard to determine. If you don’t have Google to use right away, but if you do have Google to use, which you do, then you can go ahead and search the keyword that you want to target and see what does come up. And you’re going to find that the searcher intent for content, at the top of Google, is kind of clear.

If you’re looking for best pizza shop near me for example, then Trip Advisor is probably going to give you the top fifteen pizza shops, but that’s going to be the organic listing. Google Maps is probably going to give you a few pizza shops that are highly rated and stuff like that. So, Google is ultimately going to do their best to figure out what you want based on what you’ve asked.

Paul: Yeah. Interesting. It’s a different way to think in some ways. You have to sort of think about how the organization happens. I liked your analogy of organizing the spice cabinet because you would organize it so that you could find it. And that’s very cool.

Commercial Intent

Paul: So now we talked about fresh content and that not being super critical. Because if we’re writing a story about Lincoln, the facts about Lincoln haven’t changed all that much. He was a certain height and he was the certain president and excreta, excreta.

Jeremiah: Right.

Paul: I can see that. Does the content have to have a churn to it, or does it have to have more? So, we’re not talking about Lincoln. We’re talking about the headphones we sell or the semiconductors that we sell, and so does that need to have an ever fresh look or feel really from a content point of view?

Jeremiah: It’s so frustrating to try to understand SEO sometimes or to, in my position, try to explain it because I hate when I get these answers, but it depends.

Paul: Okay. That’s fair.

Jeremiah: But I’m going to go into why that depends. So, if we are talking about Lincoln, everyone is pretty much going to say the same kind of stuff and very rarely is new information going to come out. However, if we are talking about headphones, that’s in the technology, retail space where things actually change pretty quickly. A new product comes on the market by Sony, another one comes on the market by Bose, another one by Sennheiser. It happens a few times a year, every year and everyone goes crazy about all of it. So, there’s a lot of new stuff happening in that industry and so there’s a lot of frogs leaping over each other there. So, if you’re going to play that game, you have just got to get used to being a frog playing leap frog there.

Whereas if you are a historian and you’ve written some really good stuff about Lincoln and you’ve published it, and it took you a while to get it out there. Well, guess what? You’re playing a game where a lot of people are not leap frogging each other. It’s just kind of sitting there. So, you’re in a lucky space if you’re a great historian and have written a long piece of content about that because you’re probably going to rank well, and you don’t have much competition to worry about. But then again, what is your commercial intent? What kind of money are you expecting to get for it? I hate to say that but at the end of the day, that’s where Google really starts playing commercial value, especially for me, a marketing agency.

Paul: Right.

Jeremiah: My clients all have a commercial intent with what they’re doing. In my client spaces we have a lot of competition. We have a lot of people playing leapfrog and we just have to help our client be a good racehorse, or I should say a good leapfrog in the game of it and grow some strong legs which comes down to building content, building links, ensuring user engagement is there, and that that searcher intent is accurate to the piece of content. So, it really depends on the space that you’re in, is the sort answer.

When SEO Fails Expectations

Paul: How do you see both good examples and poor examples of companies that sell the SEO magic, if you will, and then don’t fulfill the expectations? Because I would imagine, that an uneducated SEO buyer has unrealistic expectations.

Jeremiah: One hundred percent! And I see it way more than I’d like to. Unfortunately, it’s a situation in my industry where I’m kind of acting and serving as really an ambassador of my industry, to a world of businesses who have been burned by or have a bad taste in their mouth around SEO and working with an agency or someone who says they know anything about SEO. I liken it much to snake oil which sells the magic cure two hundred years ago, where some people probably do have the cure but their reputation and the likelihood that people buying from them, have been ruined by so many other people claiming they had the cure and being completely wrong about it.

And so, I think the same thing is true with SEO. I really work to try to take people into that new line of thinking and make that paradigm shift that I’ve watched you follow me through with the spice cabinet and Amazon and iTunes and showing that search engine optimization applies to a lot of things.

My favorite example of search engine optimization is using a library. Any one of us can go into any library in the United States that we have never been to and in a matter of a couple of minutes, find a single word, on a single page, in a single book, in a single section because of the way the library is structured, and books are structured with tables of contents and indexes.

So, I think really, we as a people in SEO, we owe it to the community at large to first be clear with everyone with what all SEO includes and is and requires to do properly. And then if you are a practitioner in the SEO realm in some way, pick an angle of what you want to specialize in and do it well. If you do want to be a generalist that’s fine. You’re most likely going to fall into the camp of doing a lot of consulting in a bunch of random tactics and tasks that add up to a SEO effort but ultimately, it’s a good idea to kind of pick a specialty like we have and zero in on it.

So, within the SEO space, we focus a lot on keyword research, content strategy, and link building. With that, we then produce content and build links and we find that according to our strategies if we do that properly, our clients just see really good results. And so that’s our specialty within SEO. But I only get to that after kind of laying everything out for my clients and showing them first and foremost what SEO is made up of so that they can feel comfortable and confident analyzing us and other agencies. It’s funny how many agencies go straight in, assuming that people know what SEO includes and then sell them on an aspect of it, and then the client buys it thinking that they’re getting the full part. The most common thing that we find is that a lot of companies out there claiming they know SEO, are just doing the technical portion.

Three Parts of SEO: Technical, Content, and Link Building

Jeremiah: If I break SEO down, I break it into three major categories – Technical, Content, and Link Building. The technical portion is, to me, as good as grading the property you’re about to build your house on and maybe laying the foundation. But that’s as far as it gets with technical. All the technical in the world is still not going to help you compete with really good content out there. It’s just going to help you have a platform to publish your content on and do it effectively. But you still have to publish the content and build links to the content. A lot of companies out there sell SEO and then just deliver the technical portion and the clients are scratching their heads because nothing is happening to their content, nothing is happening to their links. They don’t know anything about needing either one of those anyway but regardless, they’re upset anyway because rankings, traffic, and conversions haven’t improved. So, they fire the SEO agency and say SEO doesn’t work.

Paul: Right.

Jeremiah: So that’s the most frustrating scenario that I hear about all the time. And I have to take them and say, “Look, that’s just the beginning. You’ve taken the first step in a thousand step journey of building content and of building links.” So, that’s really what it is going to take to see the results you want.

Paul: The technical thing is like carpentry. It’s not terribly difficult but a good carpenter is worth his weight in gold.

Developing a Content Calendar

Paul: So, do you develop a content calendar? Or how deliberate is that? Or is it just, “I’ll write an article about this.”

Jeremiah: Oh, it’s very deliberate. So, we don’t espouse the idea of producing content for the sake of producing content or because somebody told you that you need to. Content ought to be produced to answer questions and problems within your industry that people are already asking. And if you do a good job of answering every single keyword with a solid piece of content, and maybe even a few different pieces of content attacking that keyword from different angles, then you’re doing a fantastic job.

I think one of my favorite examples of a content production powerhouse in the world is HubSpot. Of course, in my space, they’re very dominate. They’re a marketing automation platform. But if you look up anything about marketing, odds are you’re going to come across a HubSpot article at some point, that’s going to attack that very subject very well. Because they just do a good job of producing content. So, it needs to fall under a content strategy and that content strategy can begin in one place.

When we do SEO for a client, we will start a content strategy. We will deliver that content strategy, but that strategy document is just the beginning. We have what we call the content road map which comes after the strategy and the road map includes some of the things you referred to. A content calendar, where we say, “Okay, we have a calendar.” For us, it’s not like a schedule of two articles per month, every month. It’s more of we need to cover this list of keywords with content. Here’s how many pieces of content at the minimum we’re going to have to produce. Now let’s try to fit that into a calendar because a client only has so much budget. They can’t afford to have a hundred pieces of content written this month and neither can we scale up quickly and do that as effectively.

SEO Doesn’t Have To Take a Long Time

Paul: Let me interrupt. Even if we could scale and they did have the money, would it be wise to? Would it overwhelm?

Jeremiah: Actually, it can be. It can be wise to. So, there are some case studies in our industry of a few companies that have done that and we actually have a case study of a client who did that. On our site we have a case study for Segment where we did an SEO project and they had about a hundred and fifty pages that we did some massive optimization on very quickly. And we leveraged their internal content team, broke it out into sections, and we gave them a whole bunch of recommendations for those pages. They edited those pages. Then we built some links to those pages and then in the span of a couple of months, we improved their organic search traffic very fast, very effectively, to the order of about a hundred and twenty eight percent increase in organic search traffic. So, you can dump a flood of content on Google and if it’s well done and it’s according to a strategy, you’re going to reap the rewards and you’re going to reap them fast.

Paul: Well, that’s cool.

Jeremiah: The problem there is mainly too full. Number one, budget. It’s all manual. So, producing that content is not something that happens automated. I do not recommend any kind of automated content for SEO purposes. It might work in other capacities but from an SEO perspective, I don’t recommend it. So manual handwritten, hand edited, human content is key. And that takes time which costs money. If you pay someone to do it, and then scale, usually to get a hundred and twenty pieces of content quickly, usually one person can’t do that so we have to scale that out across a team of five, ten, fifteen people. Break it up into five, ten pieces each, something like that. And then we’ve got a scalable system to quickly build it. But that’s only if we have the resources in place. Where Segment already had a team of people that could handle that.

Paul: Sure.

Jeremiah: So, that’s a great example. I’ve seen examples where a guy named SEO Nick – He goes by SEO Nick, Nick Eubanks. He’s huge in the SEO community – He published a case study where he took a site and he built the site and built all the content, did all the keyword research, did all the content strategy and everything before launching the site. He had had the domain name but nothing on it. And he built all this and then launched on the domain name, and within like a month or two months’ time, had something on the order of a hundred thousand hits a month flowing in. Within a month to two months. 30 to 60 days. That is insane! And that required a massive effort, but I think he did the whole thing just to see first and foremost, how quickly you can actually show results from zero to one hundred with SEO and kind of break this theory that SEO has to take a long time. Of course, it took a lot of work, a lot of effort, a lot of money internally to produce all that content structure and everything, but once he hit publish, it just worked.

Paul: Okay, so now that’s great. I would not have believed it if you had not taken me through it. But if Nick had not done that in one big turn it on and it’s all there, if he had done the same thing but metered it out month by month, do you think he would have gotten to the same number of hits, or page views?

Jeremiah: Yes, I think he would have. I think he would have gotten the same number of page views. It would have just taken the total amount of time that it took him to hit publish on each one of those pages metered out and then the time for Google to actually index, simulate, and determine the value of all that content allowed to rank. So, Google can move very fast especially if Google sees a hundred and fifty thousand view urls on a site that is a huge site like eBay. Guess what? All of those urls can show up on Google within an hour or two. So, Google can move exceptionally quick. And all those pages, by the way, can rank because Google has a relationship with eBay that is like chocolate and peanut butter. So, we have to keep that in mind that that can happen. But then, the alternative scenario of spreading it out over a long period of time is why most people say SEO takes a long time. Well, because it took you a long time to do everything necessary for SEO to work.

Go At Your Own Pace With SEO

Paul: Right. Okay. Good insight. But that’s also somewhat of a comfort because it means if you go at your own pace, you’re not doomed to failure.

Jeremiah: Exactly. And that was one of the most exciting things that got me into SEO twelve years ago, or over twelve years ago. I was working for a small mom and pop shop who hired me to build their site and then after their site was built, they were happy with it and they wanted it to show up in Google. And I said, “Well, look. I don’t know anything about this new SEO thing. I’m going to teach myself here. I just discovered it. But if you guys don’t mind, I will spend every day practicing what I’ve learned, to try and get it to show up in Google well and we’ll see what happens.”

And I was very lucky and blessed that they agreed and said, “You know what? Yeah. Do it. But it has got to show results and if it doesn’t show results, we’re going to stop doing it.” So, I was like alright cool! So, I got to work on it and I spent eight hours a day inside a small mom and pop shop that sold ATVs and dirt bikes to retailers throughout the country, trying to get them to show up for the keywords they needed. And with a six-month effort, we added two million dollars onto their four million dollar revenue, just from organic search.

Paul: Wow!

Jeremiah: So, that dedicated effort internally, allowed me to work – and by the way, that was me teaching myself by doing this. That wasn’t even me knowing how to do it yet. – So, yes. You can work at your own pace with SEO and that’s probably my favorite thing about it is, whatever your pace is, you’re going to have proportional, directly proportional results to that.

Paul: Interesting! So, we’re going to shift gears here in just a moment, but do you think that we fundamentally interact with the world differently now that we have Google? I mean, I think the answer is implicitly yes, because if I’m doing anything…. That’s really a stunning fact. Adding two million dollars, adding fifty percent more revenue to a dirt bike company.

Jeremiah: Right, yeah.

Is SEO Always Worth it?

Paul: So, it’s like, wait a minute. What excuse can I use that I can’t do that in my company. I am a semiconductor manufacturer, or I’m a bicycle shop or I’m this or I’m that. So, I guess, if you’re trying to talk yourself out of SEO and you say well nobody that wants my products – let’s talk about the semiconductor stuff – is searching on Google. That seems like a silly thing to say.

Jeremiah: It’s a very rare scenario but it does happen from time to time. But it is rare.

Paul: So, can you think of a business that you would be able to call out that you would be able to say, “No it’s probably not worth doing.”

Jeremiah: And even with those, there’s an angle where you could show up because people are searching CFO headhunter, CIO head hunter, so there is still an SEO angle. You really – Aw man, I hate to give this answer – Again, it depends. It depends on the potential value or ROI that you’re going to get in return from doing SEO as to whether or not it’s worth it to do.

Now the general question of, “Are there industries where there is just no search volume?” That’s so extremely rare that I can’t think of one. I can’t really come up with a good example of one of where it wouldn’t make sense to do SEO because of search volume. But I think in places where ROI is key – small local realtors, small local interest sales people – that both work under agencies… So, like a real estate agent or an insurance agent that works under a major insurance firm. Those are examples where there is definitely search volume and it is cut through. And you want to talk about leap frog? Those frogs are killing each other to try and outrank each other.

So the value there in my opinion, for the small independent realtor or insurance agent, is not there from an SEO perspective. I would recommend going to networking events and talking to people face to face and stuff like that before investing in SEO for those types. So, I don’t serve those business models mainly because of that, because it just doesn’t work as well. So, that’s the most common scenario I think, is the cost to benefit analysis and breaking that down.

Call To Action

Paul: So, now, you get the people there, they’re viewing the content. It’s good content, but don’t you have to have a call to action.

Jeremiah: Right, yeah. The call to action needs to take people down the path also of becoming a customer so in some cases – I mean, you always need to have the option of becoming a customer quickly, kind of like the fast lane in self-checkout – But I think that there does need to be this slower option as well, where we’re carefully, steadily building relationship and nurturing our leads along into having a relationship with us.

And then, if you do it right, you have this staggered approach of different scenarios of where there is the long sell person, there’s the medium sell person and there’s the quick sell person. The quick sell clicks “Schedule Demo” or just hits “Contact Us” and calls a phone number and says, “I want to buy it. Here’s my credit card.” The medium sell says, “Put me on a demo. I’d like to look at it and then after the demo you’re probably going to have to send me stuff and I’m probably going to have to have some phone calls and answer a few questions.” And the long sell person wants to read blog articles and collect used letters and consider five different companies over the course of six months and things like that.

So, I think if you’re offering all those different scenarios then your SEO efforts are going to be best suited by already having those assets and opportunities in place. Because no matter where someone is at, in the buying cycle, if you’re bringing them in to that SEO topical source then you’re feeding them through a large funnel that you’ve set up, that takes in to consideration where they might be in their buying cycle.

How To Call Customers To Action

Paul: How do you, as an agency, help a customer deal with that? So, we’ve got the person to the site, we’ve got a “Buy Now” button somewhere there, but how do you actually, technically help them fulfill the call to action because that’s outside of SEO?

Jeremiah: Yeah, so helping them fulfill the call to action that I forgot to, I guess, mention. What I meant by taking them through that process of going through the funnel is the call to action can be a diverse set of calls to action. The most obvious call to action is buy from us. The medium term is going to be schedule a demo and that kind of thing where we’re maybe advertising the demo a little bit more on our site with content talking about what the demo is going to include and what you’re going to get out of it. So, we’re kind of selling that demo really well.

And then other calls to action, like on a blog such as when a person gets to the end of a blog article. HubSpot highly recommends putting a call to action at the end of a blog article that suggests another piece of content that’s larger on that same subject, that goes deeper into it, because if a person read all the way to end of that piece of content, they’re so heavily devoted and they’re right at the point where they’re probably going to be more open to reading more about that same thing. It’s kind of like a movie that ended too quickly and people are sitting there watching the credits, waiting for the last moments, the after credits scene to roll. They could have used more movie. You know?

Whereas, these people could use more content, so suggest an eBook or a white paper or a pdf download or another longer article, but in order to capture that longer article, I’m going to capture your email in order to give that to you. And I’ll just send that to you really quick. Also, you’re going to get a follow up email from me a couple days later with another piece on the same subject and kind of take you through the process of guiding you deeper into the funnel. So those are some calls to actions that we recommend at the very least. At the very least, capture emails on your site somewhere.

Tools For Marketing Automation

Paul: Do you implement that for customers? That actual conversion funnel? What tools do you use for that? What tools do you recommend?

Jeremiah: So, we don’t implement that for our clients. There are so many good tools out there and we try to kind of remain a little platform agnostic so we can work with whatever client platform they’re on. But we inevitably run into scenarios where we just don’t like the platforms they are on sometimes. And so, we do steer them towards something a little better. I always recommend HubSpot because they’re just a great tool. I’m not a HubSpot partner agency by the way, so I’m not getting paid to say that, just so you know. But regardless they’re a great platform.

However, they are very expensive, so we do like to look at some other platforms as well. I think Marketo is also great. Also, expensive but less than HubSpot. Sharpspring is the one we just signed up for and that we’re getting on to and I’m really liking it so far. It’s pretty interesting.

So, we will recommend, based on our clients’ needs, a platform. A lot of people don’t need, for example, a CRM. So, a lot of our clients have the nine dollar a month software product that you need to sign up for. And they’re not going to waste time putting somebody on a sales call. Also, nobody’s going to get on a sales call to buy that product. It’s nine dollars a month. That’s a quick credit card decision. You swipe and move along. So, for them, their marketing automation platform and the tools they need for marketing, are just going to be different than that of maybe an enterprise supply change management software. So, that is probably going to require a lot more of a sales effort. So, the calls to action are going to be dramatically different. And then the implementation of those calls to action, those conversion items, the lead caption on that is just going to be different as well.

Closing

Paul: Well, we’ve been speaking with Jeremiah Smith of Simple Tiger. He’s an SEO expert, and they’re an SEO agency. As you can tell, there’s a lot of value here in what he said. As you’ve been listening, we’ve been throwing out book names and different things you should go and look at. All of that will be in the Show Notes so I encourage you to look there. You’ll find links to Simple Tiger and a way to actually contact Jeremiah.

Well I want to thank you, thank you for spending the time with us and who knows, maybe we’ll have you back soon.

Jeremiah: That would be awesome! I’d be happy to come back! Thank you so much for everything, Paul. It was an honor to be here.

Paul: Alright, thank you!

More Episodes:

This is Part 4 of our podcast with Jeremiah Smith. Stay tuned for Part 5, coming soon! Jeremiah Smith will be sharing his business advice with us!

If you missed any of the previous episodes from our conversation with Jeremiah Smith, you can listen to them here:
Part 1: An Introduction to SEO With Jeremiah Smith
Part 2: SEO: Google & Artificial Intelligence
Part 3: SEO: How To Create Content For Your Business

Show Notes:

Optimizing Your Website for SEO with Ed Alexander

On Episode 65 of The Edge of Innovation, we’re talking with Ed Alexander of fanfoundry.com about how to optimize your website for SEO.

Show Notes

Ed Alexander’s fanfoundry.com
Find Ed Alexander on Twitter
Contact Ed Alexander
Find Ed Alexander on LinkedIn
Find Ed Alexander on Facebook
Search Engine Optimization: Getting on Page One
Google Trends
Link SaviorLabs Cybersecurity Assessment

Sections

Introduction
SEO: Search Engine Optimization
What You Can Do About SEO?
What is Google Trends?
Optimizing Your Website
Location Based Optimization
Creating an Authoritative Voice: Blogging Relevant Content
How to Get Your Blog Post To Be Found
Systematic Indexing – Using the Right Words
Blog Articles Should Be Recent and Relevant – Keep It Fresh
Become An Authority on Your Topic
Using In-Bound Links
Link to Authoritative Sources in Your Blog Articles

Optimizing Your Website for SEO with Ed Alexander

Introduction

Paul: Hello, everyone. This is Paul Parisi with the Edge of Innovation. I’m here with Ed Alexander of FanFoundry.com. Hello, Ed.

Ed: Hey, Paul. It’s nice to be back again. Thanks for inviting me. Things must have gone well last time.

Paul: Well, yes. Exactly. Yes. We’ve had billions and billions of listens just of our episode, so… I don’t exaggerate — ever. So, I thought we had a great, great discussion. We had a great discussion on all things sort of marketing and the digital age. And today we have a couple of topics we’d like to touch on.

SEO: Search Engine Optimization

So, today we’re going to focus on SEO, which is the acronym for Search Engine Optimization. What is search engine? What is optimization? What is all that? So let’s get into that. So when you hear the word SEO, what do you think of?

Ed: That’s a great start for a question, Paul. When I think hear the word SEO, it’s often out of the mouths of the babes — right? — a client or a prospect saying, “What do you know about SEO, Ed?” or “Paul,” or whoever you happen to be that day. I typically answer that question with a question. And my question is this: When you think of SEO, what are you thinking… What are you trying to do? You’re trying to get visitors to your website? You’re trying to game the Google search engine? What do you think that involves and what’s your positioning about that?

And I get responses along the lines of, “Yeah, affirmative. That’s all they’re interested in. But we really don’t know enough about it. All we know is it works for some people, and we really haven’t explored it enough to really know what we’re doing. So can you help us there?”

Paul: I always hear SEO, and I sort of hear people saying, “I need SEO,” like a bucket of SEO or a jar of peanut butter. They want to just buy it.

Ed: That’s right. “I’ll take a side of SEO, please.”

Paul: Well is it a side, or is it a main course? I think that really gets into your point there. What do you want to accomplish with it? So it’s not the main course. It promotes the main course. Right?

Ed: Right. So I think of SEO as having three main definitions, no matter who’s approaching it or what they’re talking about. The first one of them is they want good, quality visitors to their website. Notice I said good quality, not quantity, because I don’t think any one of you wants to be inundated with interruptions from people who will never buy. So you want quality traffic. You want the right people to be knocking on your door. And the second one, closely following that is quantity of quality visitors. A large number of quality visitors. So splitting hairs, but you get their I’m going with this. And the more people hear about that, the most they shake their heads and say, “Yeah, yeah. That’s more like it. I want quality visitors, and I want lots of them.” Not just lots of visitors.

Paul: Sounds good.

Ed: And then, of course, I also want that just to happen on its own. It has to be organic and whatever effort I do, whatever levers I pull, I’d like to have some kind of a multiplier effect because we all have the same 24-hour clock. I can’t scale my attention and time and have a balanced life. So how do we scale it? How do we multiply the benefits and the effects of it? So, when I hear those things… That’s sort of my series of definitions of what SEO could possibly mean.

Now there’s another one we haven’t talked about and that has to do with the history, kind of the DNA, or the genesis, of the whole SEO discipline, if you want to call it that. Meaning, there was a time most, many people can remember where, if you did certain things on your webpage, you could cleverly, technically cause a landslide of attention to come to your website. You can be on page one of name-the-search-engine’s search results for some time. Or perhaps, you could even purchase that position if you spent enough money, which is… If you’re in the airline business, and you’re American Lines, you can afford to do that. Right? If you’re into banking, and you’re Bank of America, you can afford to do that. So money can talk.

But even so, most of that has…I won’t say it’s vanished so much as it’s become rarified. And so that’s business. If you’re selling SEO services, it’s probably not a game you want to be in because your feet will be held to the fire, and it’s a bottomless pit. You’re always going to have to spend more money next week once this week’s budget is worn out. So you’re really just spending a lot of your marketing dollars on gaming the ads to show up on a position of the search engines, or you’re really trying to attract the right quality audience, period. So, which game would you rather play? What one is more evergreen, frankly? Certainly not the budget buster where you’re buying an ad. So I don’t really include in SEO the notion of buying advertising.

Paul: It’s sort of a manipulation technique.

Ed: Exactly. It’s a related but separate topic.

What You Can Do About SEO?

Ed: So what are the things you can do if you don’t have a budget, a billion-dollar budget, that will at least generate quality leads? And over time, with tenacity and persistence, quality flow of leads into your business?

Well, there are some things you can do, and they’re basics.

Paul: Sure. What are those?

What is Google Trends?

Ed: When I think basics, I think of starting by researching your topic well enough to get an idea of how it’s regarded. There are pretty easy tools if you’re in business and you don’t have a big budget. You can do things for free. You could use Google Trends. I love Google Trends because I can research the right approximate title to use for a blog article.

Paul: Okay. You mentioned Google Trends.

Ed: Yes, thank you.

Paul: What is Google Trends?

Ed: It’s a free tool that’s available from Google. You can just search on trends.google.com, or just use Google’s search engine or Bing or whatever and search on the key phrase “Google trends” and it will pop up. It’s a website. It’s a free website.

Paul: But what do I do? What do I do with it?

Ed: Think of it as another search engine that gives you an additional layer of intelligence.

Paul: So if I’m selling shoes, I can go into Google Trends and type in “shoes”?

Ed: You can start by typing in “shoes,” but you and I know that a single word like “shoes” is a bit broad. Think long tail.

Paul: Well, let’s say snowshoes.

Ed: Yeah. Think long tail. Think phrase, and think multiple words. So let’s use shoes for an example. Maybe it’s snowshoes, and you want to look at the trends and people searching on the word snowshoes over time. For example, you can ask yourself and pause the, pose the question, “Has snowshoeing become a more or less popular pastime in the winter?” Were more people searching on snowshoes last winter than the winter before?

Paul: So it’s search traffic, you’re saying.

Ed: Sure.

Paul: So it allows me to say, “Okay, there were a thousand last year, and there’s 50 in June.”

Ed: Almost. If we look at Google Trends right now, if you close your eyelids and the graph on the back of my eyelids shows me a trend graph, not numerical, but simply a trend line that shows me, on a seasonal or calendar-wise, date-by-date, slice-in-time basis where the ebbs and flows and peaks and trend lines are.

Paul: Does it have any magnitude?

Ed: It typically uses a 100% factor, saying, “At some point in time, this was the highest amount of search that ever occurred.” Maybe it was last year, this time—

Paul: Right. But you can’t tell—

Ed: That becomes your 100% point.

Paul: And now we’re at 50% or 25%.

Ed: Exactly right. Exactly right.

Paul: But it doesn’t tell us that there was one search or a thousand searches.

Ed: Correct. It never tells you the count of searches. It tells you the trend over time, based on a base of 100, which is the highest or low of whatever it is you’re trying to search on and measure. So if you see a trend line that says, geez, two years ago, only 50% as many people were looking for snowshoes as are looking for it today during this winter season buying snowshoes. That tells me that maybe, if I’m a retailer, and I’m in the outdoor apparel business, I may want to think about stocking more snowshoes this time around than last year, and making sure people know that I have that product so that I can sell more of what people are looking to buy. You’re meeting the market based on what it’s telling you its trend is.

Likewise, on converse, if you find out that the trends in snowshoes has sort of gone down a bit, you may want to hedge the bet and say, “I’m not going to pre-order too many snowshoes this year only because that’s inventory not paying its rent on the shelves that I could rather fill with a more popular item.”

So a retailer can make some judgments about their inventory and their forecast sales based on what they see happening in the snowshoe world.

Paul: And does it go back more than a year?

Ed: You can slice it by a year, two, or up to five years.

Paul: Okay. So I could look at periodic events. So every December, snowshoe searches goes up. So now I’d say, okay. So we’re talking about search engine optimization.

Ed: Yeah, and specifically about Google Trends as a tool.

Optimizing Your Website

Paul: Right. But here’s the thing. This is where I think it gets fuzzy for people, is we’re not really optimizing the search engine. We’re optimizing our website so the search engine likes it.

Ed: Exactly right. You’re not gaming the search engine.

Paul: Well, you’re trying to.

Ed: Sure. Well, what you’re doing is making some reasonable assumptions based on historical data that you have access to—

Paul: Okay. So this is good. So let’s break this down. I have a website. I’m an attorney in a community. And I want everybody that’s going to have a personal injury lawsuit, I want them to come to my website. Now maybe it’s personal injury, not a motor vehicle, something strange. You know, so maybe it was electrocution. You specialize in electrocution cases. That’s a lot easier to, I would imagine, manipulate the search engine on than it is on personal injury.

Ed: Of course, because electrocution, along with personal injury as a pair, just might give you a greater level of intelligence. And you’ve played right in to the segue of the next thing that’s available on Google Trends, which is, if you haven’t seen it, folks, ever, is a series of similar searches performed by people looking on the same topic. You can learn approximate, fuzzy matches of other kinds of similar searches that have been done that are in the same realm of topic that you searched on. And you might even discover there are some clever or more likely suspect ways of searching that to yield either better results than you’ve got in using your search or different results that are worth knowing about because they pertain.

Paul: So let’s, for now, as one of our, sort of, proxy examples, use a law firm. For whatever you think about lawyers, let’s just figure out how they would market themselves with search engine optimization. So you have an attorney that has three attorneys in it. They all have good degrees from good colleges. They have some good referrals on there or testimonials, I guess, would be a good thing. They have a picture of their office, and their phone number, and a contact form. What’s next? What do I do? If I come to you and I’m that attorney, and I say, “Gee, I want to optimize so that I come up in the town I work in.”

Location Based Optimization

Ed: Two parts to that answer. One has to do with location base, because you can say personal injury lawyer, Beverly, Massachusetts. And if you’re address is on your website and, say, the footer, so it’s stamped on every page, it increases the likelihood that a person looking for a personal injury lawyer in Beverly will find you. So location is certainly part of it.

Creating an Authoritative Voice: Blogging Relevant Content

Your example earlier, Paul, having to do with a specialty, electrocution personal injury, that means that your content on your website can be made more relevant if you write and speak authoritatively about your expertise in handling electrocution cases. If you’ve got that kind of casework, and it’s the example you gave, the proxy example, says, I’ve had a few of those cases, and I’m gathering a body of knowledge about that, that makes me a de facto expert, something above rank amateur and approaching expert designation in that subject. So why not create that authoritative voice? And so helping people find you means having relevant content.

So guess what? We’re talking about blogging. We’re talking about case studies. We’re talking about getting content that’s relevant to that discusses that topic on your website. It could be a PDF of a case example. It could be a blog article surveying industry trends. It could be anything that’s useful for a person who’s searching for information about that, to get the impression that you know your stuff in this topic.

Paul: So is that SEO?

Ed: Sure it is. It’s organic. Yeah.

Paul: So I go and write a blog post.

Ed: It establishes domain authority. It establishes you’re an authority, and your website’s domain’s authority on that topic.

Paul: Which the search engines like.

Ed: Exactly.

How to Get Your Blog Post To Be Found

Paul: Okay. So let’s talk about the next sort of step in that. I publish, I write a blog that says, you know, “We just helped this family who their son got electrocuted doing” this and this and this. And it’s a compelling blog. If I put that up, is it just going to be magically found by everybody?

Ed: Magically, no. However, over time… And this takes, can take weeks or months because the bots or the algorithms have to crawl and so search engines are quite busy with the billions of pages that available. It will take some time for that domain authority to establish itself. You can promote it, but at least be aware that over time, people searching on that topic will begin to discover you.

How can you help matters? You can help matters by making sure your content is rich enough. I would recommend a minimum 500 to 1000 words. 30-word blurbs, they’re ads. It’s not enough to establish authority, really. So give, write long articles. Write them authoritatively, and that gives the bots a reason to live. It gives them a reason to crawl and something to feed on when they’re crawling.

Systematic Indexing – Using the Right Words

Paul: But how does the bot determine whether I am relevant or fictional?

Ed: Great question. How can you take the word “personal injury” and “electrocution” and help enrich that as an authoritative link to good content of yours? There’s a concept that’s not all that difficult to understand, but it’s got kind of a geeky phrase. It’s called latent semantic indexing. Or LSI as they say in the biz. Right? Think of latent semantic indexing as something that’s simple as metaphors or alliterative, or approximately analogous terms that refer to electrocution, like words like “zap” or “injured,” “electric socket.” Mention the words or the equipment involved in some of the cases that you’ve covered and argued so that all the approximate context of the information enriches your authority on the subject because someone could be searching on “electric socket electrocution personal injury.” All that’s valid. All that’s relevant.

So, latent semantic indexing, in summary, is nothing more than approximating this same subject matter without sounding like a robot when you type. Write in natural prose so it’s conversational and accessible for readers and enrich it in such a way so that analogous information can also bring them to you.

A simple example is if I use the word “tree.” If I’m a botanist, and I’m searching on the word “tree,” I’m going to find information about trees. And if I have interestingly, Bing or a Google search engine, also, frankly, tracks your behavior online, for better or worse. Let’s just say now it’s for the better, and here’s why. If I’m a botanist, I’m also searching about seeds. I’m also searching about plants. Use the word “tree” to do a search, my search engine, if it’s been at all tracking my progress, knows I’m searching for plant-based results.

If I’m a logistics person, and I’m thinking about data trees, and I use the word “tree” in a search, it’s probably not going to feed me information about trees and seeds and plants. Based on your search history, it’s going to say, “Tree — oh, this is a logistics person.” And they’ve used searches on logic trees and on forced ranking and other kinds of statistical methods. It’s going to start, interpret the words “tree” saying, you want more like this. Or this kind of a tree result, not a plant.

So we help ourselves along simply by making use of search engines, and they, in return, repay the favor by approximating our intentions based on what limited information we give them. So that’s latent semantic indexing.

Paul: Is that specifically when I’m preparing the blog post? Is latent semantic indexing taking into account what I’m writing in the blog post, or I do that myself?

Ed: It’s a duality sort of thing. It’s a closed-loop sort of conversation. I, the author, am having a conversation with the reader saying “I’m talking about, as the lawyer, the electrocution, personal injury case, and I’m going to use a number of things to describe the circumstances in which it happened. And those are all relevant to the electrocution and personal injury case.

If I’m a person on the other side of the looking glass who’s searching on that information, I can think of a number of different approximate but not quite the same terms to do a search. It will still bring me back to that content that you wrote because…

Paul: And that’s a function of the search engine.

Ed: Yeah. It’s a function of the search engine bot. So this is a great conversation to have because it goes back to my earlier statement about gaming the search engines. It used to be you could figure out how to use, frankly, gray or black-hat tactics to key load and stuff words onto your website to improve its search engine ranking. And that’s, of course, has been debunked and, frankly, circumvented by sophistication of search engines. So you can’t game it that way anymore. I’d like to say that we’re no longer algo-slaves. We’re no longer slaves to the algorithm. And frankly, there’s no more algo-terrorism either because you can’t terrorize people with your algorithm if rich content is the intention. And so those revisions to the way search is performed or search is executed on a search engine have improved so that we really get good quality results, because that’s, after all, what a Google or a Bing or a Yahoo really wants, is for you to be happy with the results you get.

Paul: Let me think about that. What if I put a story, a fictional story about electrocution on there? How would the search engine see that? And how would it not know… Or it may not know, and it may be to my benefit to do that. Or it may be to my detriment. So, in other words, does it… I’m wondering, because we’ve got to write good, rich content. So if I took an Edgar Allan Poe story and changed a few words to electrocution and put that on the website, let’s assume that there wasn’t duplicate content, but it was a rich story. Would that enter to my benefit or to my deficit? It would be an interesting test, I think.

Ed: I suppose it would. I don’t know that I know of anybody who’s ever performed that kind of a test.

Blog Articles Should Be Recent and Relevant – Keep It Fresh

Paul: My question is okay, so you go and you’re my SEO expert. I’ve hired you. And you say, “Paul, you’re an attorney. You do this. Write a blog post about your three main cases that you won last year.” So I write three articles. And we then post that. One this month, one next month, one the month after. And what you’re saying is, in the physics of the situation, the search engines will consume that data, see words that are similar to electrocution and etc., etc. And correlate that and say there is something relevant here when somebody searches for that. And so I think, to put it simply, that’s search engine optimization, is we have given the search engines something they can consume and then hand back to people within a certain scope of ideas. Is that fair?

Ed: That’s completely fair. Interestingly, you’ve added a dimension, Paul, which is time. You mentioned doing an article this month, an article next month, and an article the following month. So let’s say you’re that personal injury lawyer, and those are the three cases. That’s it. I’ve used up my caseload bucket. Let’s beg the next question. A year from now, I have no new personal injury law cases. I did those three two years ago. I really want to do more of this kind of business.

What’s going to happen when a person searches on my content, and they find 2012 or 2013 information, and that’s the most recent. If it’s relevant, they might still indulge someone’s curiosity enough to say, “Okay. I’m in. I’m clicking through.”

What about the skeptical person who’s looking for current information. Maybe something new has happened in the law practice or in the electrician business or anything at all new in society that might make that information, frankly, dated or irrelevant? It’s helpful in a case like that, if you’re the author, you’re the lawyer, you’ve written those articles, to refresh it from time to time, to keep it evergreen. If, in fact, it is evergreen, don’t let a date reference ding you from the outset based on someone’s superstition about that date.

Paul: Good point.

Ed: So you can refresh the content, maybe republish the same blog article and label it as an update. “By the way, I have new information that’s changed in the face of this subject, and I’m going to republish this article because…even though it was originally published in 2012.” Make all those transparent references so people know that you’re republishing. I think that’s a favor to the reader.

But that improves the evergreen-ness of your content by keeping it fresh. Once again, it gets indexed, it gets crawled, the searcher searches, they find the result. It’s a current result now, and it helps with your authority from the viewpoint of a person who is concerned about the currency of your knowledge.

Paul: Alright. I think to summarize that is you’re saying you need to have some regular cadence of output so that the search engines keep consuming it. But I don’t think you’re saying that on month four you put up a cake recipe. That’s not as valid as saying, “emerging trends in personal injury.” That would be better than putting up a cake recipe.

Ed: Of course. Relevant content. Going back to the example I mentioned earlier at the outset about the three things that really come to mind when you think about what SEO is, it is quality referrals to my website. And for following along that is the volume of quality referrals. Right? So you’re absolutely right. That plays into the first two aspects.

Paul: Okay. Well, it sounds like we’ve solved search engine optimization.

Ed: Solved?

Paul: I don’t mean to be facetious, but is that really simply what is it?

Become An Authority on Your Topic

Ed: Well, sure we’ve covered doing research. You’ve got to research your topic, find out how people are searching for that topic you’re interested in publishing about and being found as an authority on that subject. The second part is becoming an authority — not in a genuine sense, publishing authoritative content because you deserve and you have that expertise. Right? And then making it searchable by enriching it with analogous information and not write for search engine as opposed — oh, excuse me — writing for humans as opposed to search engines. So it’s authentic, it’s authoritative, and it’s human and accessible.

Over time, that helps your search engine results. Will that necessarily land you a page one Google search engine result? We talked about that a year ago when we last met, and we talked about the same subject. And my answer then is the same answer now, which is, I’m not sure page one search result is necessarily the answer for one other reason that we didn’t talk about last time, and that has more to do with a temporary situation, but it’s an anomaly. And that is, we see an awful lot of other kinds of information appearing on our search engine results.

What’s at the top of page one of a Google search now? Ads. What’s on the left side bar? Ads. What’s in the footer below the search engine results? Ads. You’re lucky to see up to five organic results that match what you’re searching on. So I hate to love search engines, and I love to hate them, 20 years ago, it was great because an Infoseek or an Excite or an AOL or a Ask Jeeves search engine, they were have dozen of them that have all been weeded out since then. But you did a search. You’re searching on a, frankly, a brute-force indexing method, where any business would have to list itself in the directory, like a Yellow Pages online, frankly. Before, the notion that a Google and Bing came along which they us an algorithm to sort the data as opposed to individuals like you and me creating an entry in a directory on our own behalf.

The algorithms changes haven’t been as great in terms of their change, in the amount of change that they’ve forced on the way we behave. What has happened is our own search engine results are getting cluttered by for-profit.

Paul: Right. Okay.

Ed: That’s the game people are competing in now. Frankly, I call it zombie search because their search engine results aren’t always going to land you on page one if you’re not one of the top three. I’m not too worried about it. Most of us now have to click through to page two or three to get a sufficient result to actually see the link we’re really looking for, the content we really want to get to.

What else plays to it?

Paul: Well, continuing on this attorney example. So they post something in November, in December, and January — three months. Is there an effective use of other blogs or getting people to reference you? That was always the Holy Grail is to get in-bound links. So, first, is that a good thing? I can’t see how it’s a bad thing, but is it the best thing? Is that what you should be investing in?

Ed: Great question. Link exchanges or in-bound links is something that can happen organically if someone discovers you and decides to link back to you because you’re their authority. Buying them or manipulating or investing a lot of effort and hoping that some other authority will link back to you can be its own full-time job. At the end of the day, you still have to make a buck running your business, applying your trade. So it’s, to me, is like having an ad budget. You’ll always spend more because of what you spent to keep up the pace, you have to spend more.

It’s a balance you need to decide to reconcile for yourself as a professional. Some amount of link exchange could happen over time just based on you being the authority as long as you have.

Link to Authoritative Sources in Your Blog Articles

I’ve give you an example. I’ll use my own business. But I’ll make it an analogy for the lawyer as well. When I write a blog article, I make a habit if… Since I’m no genius, and I’m usually referring other authoritative sources to help support whatever position I’m taking in my blog article or the advice I’m getting, I’m going to refer back to either a customer example or a white paper or a think tank, or some other kind of authoritative source or, frankly, another piece of media publication that has been fodder or food or input for the blog article I’m writing to you today. Well, I like my readers to have access to the authoritative source just…not because I don’t believe I’m worthwhile but only because if a person wants to read more about it, why not make my blog article be the jumping off spot to go find more depth on that particular topic? And I live-link to it.

But I also put the directory at the bottom of my blog, and I link outwards to the source I’m referring. So I do more outbound linking than inbound. The cool thing about that is anybody who’s worth their salt, doing SEO, does a search on who’s linked to their website. Then people discover that the FanFoundry blog has an article that’s referring to them because of the context in which it appears. So my ethical goal is, of course, to make sure that what I’m linking, whoever I’m linking back to is worth their while. I’m not milking their URL as a link to me or a way to get attention. I’m doing it because I’m helping the reader. My intention is for people to help find good information.

Paul: Sure. That’s the top level reason. But is there any hope for a quid pro quo?

Ed: There is hope because it’s happened. It’s happened for me.

Paul: And that is a legitimate hope?

Ed: Absolutely. Absolutely.

Paul: So these links might engender backlinks.

Ed: They might engender backlinks, but I’ll make you no promises. What I can say, though, however, is that I’ve been discovered, frankly, from some of my writings, by other authoritative sources who have said, “Hey, geez, wouldn’t you like to do a podcast with us?” What are the chances right now? “Maybe you would like to speak at our convention.” Or, “We have a client need that we can’t solve, but you apparently can.” It’s paid off for me in all three of those ways.

Paul: Oh, cool.

Ed: So it’s not necessarily the link building which is the end goal. The end result is are you providing a benefit and some value to people that they’ll, in turn, either compensate or recognize you for doing that. That’s the fondest hope I can have for anybody as they’re being beneficial to others. You know, it’s the old Boy Scout in me, rising to the service. I was in Boy Scouts.

Paul: Well thank you for coming. We’ve been talking with Ed Alexander of fanfoundry.com and you’ll be able to find out more information about Ed and his company in our shownotes as well as links to some of the resources we’ve talked about.

Thank you very much and we look forward to next time on the Edge Of Innovation.

How to Do Link Building for a Brand New Website

FacebookTwitterGoogleLinkedin It’s done. After months of dreaming, planning, sketching, wireframing, designing, and developing, your brand new website is alive. But now what? Now that your website is live, the real work has begun—the work of building links and authority. Your website is only as awesome as it is authoritative. So, how do you take your shiny new website from its new-kid-on-the-block status and give it some link love? Don’t Do Link Building Like This First, there are some ways to not to do link building. Most of these are obvious, but let me just run through the basics. Don’t use a link network Don’t buy links Don’t exchange links Don’t do directory submissions Don’t be…

Originally posted here:

How to Do Link Building for a Brand New Website

© 2026 Paul Parisi

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑