On Episode 114 of The Edge of Innovation, we’re talking with executive advisor Scott Monty about how innovators can be peripheral visionaries!

Hacking the Future of Business!
On Episode 114 of The Edge of Innovation, we’re talking with executive advisor Scott Monty about how innovators can be peripheral visionaries!
On Episode 111 of The Edge of Innovation, we’re continuing our conversation with inventor Falk Wolsky! This time we’re talking about why it’s important to stay curious as an innovator!
Introduction
Stay Curious About Everything
What Makes You Unique is Curiosity
Innogate Tech
You Need To Have An API Strategy
Falk Asks About Paul’s Inventions
Is Automation a Good Thing?
Making People Useful Again
Training People Who Are Willing To Learn
How Do You Motivate People To Change?
Conclusion: “Stay Curious”
More Episodes
Show Notes
Paul: We’re talking with Falk Wolsky. He’s the Chief Innovation Officer with Innogate Tech.
Is there anything specific you would like to talk about in this interview that would be helpful, you think, that I haven’t touched on yet?
Falk: This is a hard question.
Paul: I know. I’m sorry.
Falk: Yes, yes. I will not sell my product. That is not fair. We talked about innovation, but I’m very interesting, hearing about how maybe we all will see supernova very soon. Scientists are very interested in it because in the nebula of Orion, there is one star, and he lose in the brightness, right? And in these days, in these weeks. And people are very curious because it’s maybe a sign that he will have supernovas. First time we actually can watch supernova.
Why I tell you this? Because you come back to this curiosity. Now I might say, “Why I should care? It’s not economically relevant. It’s not relevant for my calendar. It’s not relevant for my relationship and so on and so on.” But somehow, we are all part of this very big game. Right? We are the very small bubble, in a very small blue planet, flying around the very small star, in a very small galaxy and surrounding us. Might say this is a wonderful to trigger to look up and say, “Wow. Cool. Amazing.” This wow-cool-amazing is a wonderful world.” Let’s come back and have a wonderful world for Michael Ende, one of my favorite authors as a child. He was writing “The Neverending Story.” He said if you’re getting adult but don’t stay a child, you’re not a human.
Paul: Yeah, that’s true.
Falk: But what it is, is the eyes of children, not everywhere to see wonders but to stay curious. The one is you cannot see any time. Again, you have seen the buck. It’s still a buck. Wonderful. And after a thousand times, it’s still a buck. You learned it. Nevertheless, there is so much interesting things and to keep curious and stay curious.
Falk: When you ask what is to say, what is to talk about, this is the key. Staying curious. In our world, it’s the definition. Maybe even to connect it to Masamune Shirow’s “Ghost in the Shell.” It is one of the best and most accurate future prediction, some of any book I read. I read Asimov. I read Stanislav Lem and a lot of Strugatski. And so on and so on. Everyone has this vision how the future could be. But this Masamune Shirow was most accurate for fifty years. I’ll watch this because we get a good impression of what will be.
And there’s one scene – everything is very philosophical in this, and very military. It’s crazy all the time. It’s a shooting. It’s the special force of military for the government and so on. But there’s a scene with robots. They’re getting their own artificial intelligence, and they must curious. And that curiosity makes them special. And there’s one sentence in this time in which we live now, when everybody can have access to information as much as he need, because we all have internet. What makes you unique is curiosity. Because only then you will go and search and find and will build your own uniqueness. That’s a wonderful reward.
Paul: Yes, I think you’re right. I think, as I’ve been taking notes here, I underlined curiosity twice. I think that’s the definitive differentiator for an innovator. It’s somebody that’s really curious and how are we going to solve this in a different way.
So, one of the things that we will include in our show notes is some of the links that Falk has alluded to and also some of the things that he reads and frequents, both on the supernova and different things that he’s interested in as well as to his company, which… Well, tell us a little bit about that. You’re headquartered where? And what do you actually do on a daily basis?
Falk: The very first is it might be interesting. I live in two different countries, mostly likely in the hotels, because I work in Germany, and I work in Ukraine.
Paul: Okay.
Falk: Ukraine because I met my wonderful wife last year, and she was actually from Ukraine. I was, you will laugh about, curious to fly there and get in contact because she was reading, as one of the last people even I know — and then women — she was reading Strugatski. I said, “Not true. I need to get to know to you.” I come to Ukraine and we get in touch, and we fall in love, and we married. So, Ukraine. This is where Innogate reside.
Innogate is mainly focused to business applications. Roughly speaking about all this AP. And doing this for very big companies in the energy sector. In Ukraine you have DTEK for example. It’s a very big one. And what I dislike, they have, it seems to me still over 80% of charcoal to power. This is coal to power. Right? So, this is not really friendly. And in Ukraine, nobody cares. Right? They are not developed like, for example, Germany, when they look really close to the detail. How will we make electricity?
But they had a very good program and energy tariff in Ukraine to support solar and wind power. And this was a huge push also for this DTEK. And the baseline is still there’s people working there already. Roughly 300,000 people so far, I remember. That’s a lot. And they somehow need to work. And a workplace software all the time, contracted to customers, contracted to suppliers, management, field service — all this stuff.
And this kind of software Innogate makes. And, DTEK has a digitalization, master plan because they also understand when we do all of the paper forms. It will be a little bit slow. We cannot grow internationally. We cannot grow. We cannot save cost. And to digitalize, processes, is a huge thing.
Actually it starts very boring with the first question. Do you have everywhere Wi-Fi?
They say, “Huh? Yes, yes, we have. No, you mean office.”
“I don’t mean office. I mean do you have everywhere Wi-Fi? In the production sites, in the markets, at the stations where you go around?”
And then, ah-ha, okay, if you have everywhere Wi-Fi, people can work in a close network, and you have applications. Everyone has a smartphone that they need to access. That’s the first step.
Falk: Then the question, do you have an API strategy? API is the possibility to offer you services for first to yourself. You will develop faster when you have a clear API strategy, and you can show others that you have these services. It was a very nice example. I worked once in Germany for E.ON, also energy producer. And they had to — you cannot believe. They had 800 internal — no. 800 external APIs and,1500 internal. It’s pretty lot. They said, “We have somehow we have 18 APIs only to get zip codes.”
Paul: Wow.
Falk: But these APIs, it’s a very good point when you can first invite developers, companies, and external service partners to go with you, together, and create a value. If you have smart meters, it’s very nice but how to connect and how to invite all the companies to invent something on that infrastructure, go with you? You need to have an API.
This, for example, I did also here in Germany, in GK where I worked for retail. This is one of the biggest companies producing software for retail. Whenever you go, for example, there’s retailers like Lidl, Walmart, we step by step. Also, go for American Market. And so, we go step by step then to produce software for the point of sale. One of the biggest, because this is a quite complex process. And it’s the same. I came to company and say, very brave actually, I said, “You don’t have an API strategy. You have to one. You have to have one.” We have now a very good API, and people, step by step, can integrate with us.
Falk: And that’s a very first point when you come in the sense of innovation, first make the basics. Right? Because you cannot invent something if you cannot connect to a company. API first, the right structure to scale. That is the point when you’ll come up, and then you can build step by step. I said, “Okay, we have to payment, we have to integrate with different software windows. We have to do this and this and that, and create products and so on.” And then teams, step by step, develop it.
Paul: Fascinating.
Falk: Oh, okay. Now I have a question too. What about you? We talked a lot about me. Pretty boring. What about you? Who are you? And what you did? You’re also an inventor, I heard.
Paul: Yeah, I’m multidiscipline, done a lot of manufacturing stuff, a lot of technology stuff and when technology, computers come out, I saw a way to do a lot of the things that you would do in the manufacturing sector without getting your hands dirty. It’s like a manufacturing suite without – there’s no oil or grease. You don’t have to get dirt under your fingernails. I’ve done a lot of that over years, and I love technology. You know, the same stuff that you’ve done. We’re taking software, writing it. I’ve written software. Did a startup that was e-forensics in the email sector.
Falk: Yeah, okay. Very interesting.
Paul: Ended up selling that. I’ve done publishing software, publishing automation software for financial publishing and things like that. And the company I’m currently doing is sort of more a labor of love, but it’s an IT services firm, and I had an IT services firm in — let me think… I sold it in 2000, after about ten years. I really enjoyed that company. So, I started another one, IT consulting. And I’m sort of building that up right now. And that’s going very well and I’m enjoying it.
Falk: You’re so very early to potential in this software to automate everything. Right?
Paul: Yes.
Falk: This is the footprint I see when you told this.
Paul: Very much so. Very much so. There was an Apple campaign with Kinkos, very old, called Wheels for the Mind. And it really symbolized, or encapsulated, what you could do with technology. It was the ability to automate and give people more efficiency and basically amplify the number of people you had.
Falk: Let me ask you something about it.
Paul: Yeah.
Falk: With my wife, we will build a foundation. And the foundation should take care about what we call the youthless society. I’m pretty sure you have heard already about it. Youthless society is the people, they get out-automated of their jobs. We have this discussion a lot, and I mean we have now a huge quote of people in the university already, and their jobs they later do still don’t exist.
And on the other hand, we have a huge amount of people, they will just out-automate, I say. As I see two directions as a very first — the truckers and the lawyers. The problem on them is they’re not high-skilled. If the trucks — especially the trucks are super easy in exchange to cars on the street in the city, but on the highway, it’s easier. And the big companies are very near to getting full-automated solutions of that in the range of five years. This is millions of people. Millions.
What they will do? They go to elderly care? I don’t believe so. They have, most of the time, no second job. And this is what you call the youthless society, and they will get more and more by this automation. So, one of the philosophical questions goes exactly this: If a human understands he can automate something, he will do. But it’s not always a good thing. How do you see this?
Paul: Well, first of all, I mean, what we’re doing, we’re in the IT space. And the unemployment rate in the US is under 4%, under 3%. You can’t hire anybody. And what we we’re doing is we’re taking people that are unemployable or not skilled in technology and training them. If we can take a person who has good personality skills, we can add to them systems, automation, that can help them deliver technology solutions to a certain level.
I think that the new economy can be bent to the will of making people useful again. I think there’s a tremendous need for making them useful. And I think it’s going to be interesting because there’s going to be people who are not willing to want to learn something new. That’s the hardest thing to overcome, is how do you motivate somebody who has invested the large majority of their life into something that is now obsolete. And how do you get over that? I think that’s something that we need to come to terms with.
But I think it’s happened. There’s been industries. You know, you look at here in America, there’s been many industries that have come and gone that have been overseas moved to Asia or different countries. And, now many of those people, I don’t think were properly mentored or properly brought along, if you will. They weren’t really stewarded well. They were sort of allowed to just exist or have a basic subsistence life. But I think they also allowed themselves to have that basic subsistence life. And I think our society, in some ways encouraged that through welfare and things like that.
Paul: There’s a big argument there is, well, we should take care of these people. But if you didn’t have it, and they were forced to go out and get a job, then they’d learn the new technologies, and so what I’m trying to do is, I want to take people and offer them free training and see if they’re interested in technology jobs and offer them… and hire people that have a good personality. Because that’s the one thing I can’t train is, if you have a bad personality, I can’t do anything about that. But I can teach you how to talk to a person and say, “Oh, what’s your issue? Oh, okay. Well, let me get the right person for you.” I can do all sorts of levels at that.
And so I think that, in some ways, we have a lot of green fields coming up. You know, that there’s a lot of opportunity in ways that people would have never imagined they could have worked twenty years ago or ten years ago. But it’s what we do with that. I think technology enables that, just like it enables all these other things. These people who are unwilling to change, I don’t think we just dismiss them and say, “Well, tough for you.” I think we need to, as a society, figure out how to shepherd them along so that they feel okay to…
In some ways, it’s sort of like “Well, you made the wrong bet. You went into the wrong career that isn’t going to be a long-lasting career, that you’re not going to be able to retire into.” I mean, even doctors nowadays, who knows what’s going to happen with them in America with the healthcare changes. If you were a doctor, you were set for life. Well, now it may turn into no. You have a standard wage, and that’s the way it is. It’s an interesting change.
So, I agree that we need to be good stewards of technology. And I do think that there is a tremendous potential for it to do exactly what you’re saying, that, for all these people to just be lost and not to be able to do that. I think what will happen is people will realize a little bit too late. I think we’re early realizing this. That they will realize that “Oh my gosh, we need to make these people useful to the technology economy because that’s the only way it’s going to scale.” So that’s my two cents.
Falk: Very good one. Very good one. I liked your answer a lot. Thank you very much. Some points I do agree. Some points are on my radar, let’s say two. Some are completely new.
Falk: What I take out of it is, what is not new is education, education, education. What is new to me, motivation. The big point is to motivate the guys who don’t want to learn new things. That is interesting. That is really a point when you say, “Okay, wow! How I do motivate them to change with the time?” And that is maybe the bigger one instead of education. Education you have all the tools in the moment. They’re electronic, classic. Right? You can do it. You can measure it afterward. But to motivate them, it’s a very good question. I will chew on it, I would say.
Paul: That’s the work. That’s the real work is to motivate them. So it’s an emotional thing is to…
Falk: True. That’s very good. This is something for my wife. She’s very good in all emotional stuff. She’s a marketing officer. She created a lot of brands. She’s very famous in Ukraine. [She has her own community, I might say. When she, step by step, going for international, and she is my emotional brain. So, I am the technical brain, and we are absolutely… Some people say we, as a couple, are complete. Might be. Might be.
Paul: I understand. I know exactly what you mean.
Paul: Well excellent. We’ve been talking with Falk Wolsky. He’s the chief innovation officer with Innogate Tech, and you’re headquartered in — what would you say? Both Ukraine and…
Falk: Kiev. The one is in Kiev, Ukraine, and Germany, Berlin. Let’s say Berlin.
Paul: Okay. And we’ve had a great talk about innovation, and there’ll be a lot of links in the show notes to both his company and some of the things we’ve talked about. Any final words you’d like to say?
Falk: If I say now “stay curious,” it’s too, too simple.
Paul: Well. That’s a good one to say. Stay curious. I like that.
Falk: Stay curious. The final thought is that I’m very thankful for the talk. I enjoyed it a lot.
Paul: Excellent.
Falk: It was very good questions. Thank you also for that. And I wish all of us, especially in this times we have, in 2020 good year. Let’s come safe through to the year. This is concerning most of us in the moment, I believe.
And stay curious is the key. Right? Because, especially we see our future is more and more speed up, uncertain, flexible, changing. Everything is not like it was yesterday already. We will only survive if we are flexible and curious.
Paul: Yes, absolutely. Good words. Well, thank you very much.
Falk: Thank you very much too. It was a pleasure to talk to you.
Paul: It was a pleasure to talk to you too.
This is Part 3 of 3 our interview with Falk Wolsky. If you missed Parts 1 & 2, you can listen to them here:
Part 1: Exploring Innovation & Inventing With Falk Wolsky
Part 2: What Sets Inventors Apart From Other People?
On Episode 110 of The Edge of Innovation, we’re continuing our conversation with inventor Falk Wolsky! This time we’re talking about what sets inventors apart from other people!
On Episode 109 of The Edge of Innovation, we’re talking with Chief Innovation Officer Falk Wolsky, about innovation and inventing!
Introduction
What is Innovation?
Innovation in the World of Technology
The Magic of IT
One of Falk’s Inventions: The SmartPen
Why Falk Invented The Smart Pen
How The Smart Pen Works
Curiosity: Motivating Inventors
Knowing Where to Start When Making an Idea Reality
Closing
More Episodes
Show Notes
Paul: Hi, how are you?
Falk: Ah, I’m good. How are you?
Paul: Very good. So, where are you tonight?
Falk: I am actually in a small village in Saxony. This village is called Schöneck and it’s the headquarter of our company. This is already story enough.
Paul: Wow.
Falk: It’s amazing. It’s very, very small village. I might say, 10% of the population is employees of this company.
Paul: Oh really? Wow. That’s cool.
Falk: Yes. No, it, it looks like. I believe it’s not that much, but somehow, sometimes you get this impression because I work most likely in the capitals, in many different countries, and let’s say this is not a capital. It’s where fox and rabbits say goodnight to each other. We have a fairytale about this.
Paul: Cool. Very cool. Well, we’re talking with Falk Wolsky. Is that how we say your name?
Falk: That is absolutely right.
Paul: Alright. So, what is your role at Innogate Tech?
Falk: At Innogate Tech, I’m a chief innovation officer, and at GK Software, I’m the head of innovation. Both means actually the same. I look a little bit into the future and define strategies and detail products and so on.
Paul: Alright. So let’s, for our, for our listeners, you know, we’re the Edge of Innovation, but how do you define innovation and what is it? When you go to work, when you wake up… It’s a good time of year. We’re recording this in early January. And what have you sort of said, okay, I’ve got to innovate this year. What does that look like to you?
Falk: Already many questions in one. I might say, I saw a wonderful chart from Andy Brukov. He’s very famous in AI, and he showed a chart, a pie diagram. 90% was blue. And this is people who use stuff. Let’s say 9% was yellow. This is people who adopt stuff and increase or enrich stuff. And 1% of people actually create stuff. That was very interesting.
And if you ask what is innovation, it’s most likely about the thing to create. I’m very lucky I’m in IT. So actually, I can, as I’m also developer, by myself, can create things out of nothing. So, I just go my laptop and I start to code. So actually I’m a source from the brain directly to a product. It was very interesting.
So, I might say the creation of things, the real creation — not only the combination or the adoption — this is the innovation point. When things come together and you have a spark of idea and say, “Ah, cool. This is something new. This is interesting. This is useful.”
Paul: Interesting. Okay. So, do you think your innovation… How would you characterize it? Do you think it’s mostly in the technology world?
Falk: I might say yes. I cannot not say… I’m not a technologist, so I’m, I’m a really pure guy in my brain, in what I like and what I follow. I’m not good in chemistry, for example. I will never make any big innovation in chemistry.
What I do have, I have multiple disciplines. I’m looking for energy. So, I was in Africa and looking to innovate there how people can get solar energy because the current approach doesn’t fit for the people itself. I’m here with IT in retail, for example. With Innogate, we are in IT for energy provider, one of the largest energy providers in Ukraine, actually.
So, this is completely mixed and I’m reading about everything. What is creeping around this technology, not only IT. And some of the time, it’s a combination of this. So, I have not a limited field but chemistry, mathematics — this is not for me. I will not innovate there.
Paul: But now here, the, when you say IT to a person in the United States, they think about the people who keep the networks running. And I think you’re talking about IT as really the application of information technology to solve a problem. Is that fair?
Falk: Yes, that is absolutely true. I can say by a combination of technology, IT, programming, marketing, and business model, I make digital products. That’s absolutely right. It’s not a simple app. Some of these products are more complex because you have something in the database, something in the middleware, some service flying around, some cloud stuff to unite all this, make it synchronized, make it swing in harmony and build a product that actually people can use in the front and simple, as an app or website. That is the magic.
Paul: Right, right. So, do you have an example that you can share with us — not something that’s confidential, obviously — of where you have sort of gotten things to work together that wouldn’t have been obvious otherwise?
Falk: There was a very prominent example. It’s already in the past. I was inventor of the first pen that vibrates when you make a mistake. It was so famous that you even had [inaudible] talking about it. It was very funny. And this was in the 1915 it seems to me, 1914, something like this. And there was multiple things coming together from the physical product, hardware, the design of a pen, where inside fits a computer, where on this computer fits enough software that the pen by itself, without any help, can detect what you write and then vibrate when you do mistakes.
So, this was already complex. I had twenty people, very multi-disciplinary because you have a lot of machine learning. You have hardware designs, sensors. You have [inaudible] catalogs. You have user interfaces. Everything. Right? This is when it all comes together in a very small product. For the user it was simple. Battery in, switching it on, and it was working. That’s all.
Paul: Hmm. Interesting. What did you learn through the lifecycle of the evolution of that product that you didn’t anticipate?
Falk: I must say I anticipated almost everything.
Paul: Really? Okay, so there wasn’t any surprise? Like, did it do as well as you thought it would do?
Falk: Actually yes. Yes.
Paul: Okay.
Falk: I was in the moment… It was very funny story. I was sitting at home and my big son actually make homework. Right? And he makes so many mistakes, and he knows how to do it. He just was not focused. My wife said, “Oh, now he could need a pen with electrical shock.” Right?
I said, “Come on. That’s just one failure.” But actually, vibrating would be cool. But in that moment, let’s say in twenty minutes – It was 2012 October – I had the full idea of how it will work. And that’s innovation.
Paul: Interesting, yeah.
Falk: It will be by motion sensors. It will be this, this, this. I can construct. Okay, you have a lot of research later on. I cannot say I was understand which library, language, I will already use. This comes later. This was already clear. Form factor was clear. Possibility was not clear.
So, the amazing fact is when you have then the prototype first. It would actually do what you told it will do. And even if people say it’s not possible because this motion sensors was used on the scale of an airplane. Now we packed them into a pen, and everybody say impossible. But it was possible. But I believed in this pretty much from the beginning, I might say.
Paul: Interesting. So, was this to help people to learn to write better?
Falk: Yes. There was multiple interesting things. The first is for children. When they come in the school and the teacher gives them back the homework after some days with the red marks, what they all did wrong, this is a very bad trigger to learn things. But the pen immediately makes you aware, look twice, and you look twice, and you say, “Ah, yeah. True. I made mistake here, that…” This is so-called positive learning. People will learn, children will learn much faster and with much more fun to write.
And when pen can understand your handwriting in the moment you do it, we have also example excellent with Word, then you, in real time, see, when you write something on a paper, it appears in Word. Then you have multiple scenarios from hospitals, doctors, production plans, everywhere where it’s still handwriting needed and by regulatory, even by law, expected. Signature. To understand is this your signature or not? Very interesting.
So, there’s a lot of cases, of what you can do with it, and not only for children.
Paul: Wow. That’s cool. So how did you do it? Did you use vector analysis? Did you use scanners? Or how did you actually detect it?
Falk: Ah, it was exactly the story from this moment when I talked about it. The first from decide of a product, it was clear. Battery in, switch on. It must work. That means a lot of things you cannot do, because if you need something else, it would not fit to the product. Most of the older people in the market, when they order products, they rely on some additional. Sometimes a small box you have to climb with the paper. I don’t want. Sometimes in surface where only you can write on this. I don’t want it. Sometimes a special paper with a camera. I don’t want it. I say it must work. Battery in, switch on, go.
The only way to do was to use motion sensors, very fine-graded motion sensors. Now it gets complex. If you only have assimilation and rotation, you’re blind. You have no idea where you are. You only know I move. And then you are start very complex with mathematical calculations. You collect information, and you calculate how much I moved, how much to accelerate, how much I turn, and then you step by step calculate out of it what actually the tip of the pen does.
The tip on the pen on the paper, if you have this, what it does, this motion, then you can give this information to a handwriting recognition engine because it already lives by two-dimensional data. But the magic is out of blindness, only by rotation and assimilation to understand what the pen does. This was the magic. This was the thing that nobody before had gone through.
And there was all six people working only on that to understand. With every case, and we had brilliant people, they worked almost a year to achieve. And we achieved it. It was working. No matter where. You can write upside down, on the paper, on the table, whatever. It was no matter. Right? It was very interesting. We even had small video writing the air because it’s also motion. You have big letters, but in general, it’s the same.
Paul: So you had this. You’re sitting at a home, and your wife is saying, you know, “Can’t we make an electroshock pen?” And you have an epiphany. What made you think that you could do this? What, leading up to that point said, “I have the nerve to be able to say ‘This, this is real. This is something I can try”?
Falk: I would say similar on Innogate or in the position that I do now for GK, it’s very similar. I have, first, long time history when I was developing a lot of stuff by myself, hands on. I know database. I know about development. I know a little bit of Java development. Any kind. I did a lot career. So, you have already gut feeling, a rough-gut feeling.
The second is I’m, by nature, unbelievable curious for everything. I’m following quite clear what is the development in the machine learning. I’m following what is the development in the flying taxi. I am following what is the development in solar panels collecting sun and producing water. It’s endless. This curiosity leads you to swallowing the information, what is existing. Some of the time an innovation appears also by combining things clever and saying, “Ah, if I took this and this and merge it, then it’s actually possible.”
And, I did before, a project about IoT. Actually, I was inventing another thing, but it’s more to smile. It was the first coffee machine that could send tweets. And it could also receive tweets. So, you can control your coffee machine via Twitter. And it sounds a little bit to smile, but actually for brand and for food service, it’s a pretty cool thing.
And from that time, I had already a good experience in IoT and small computers and how to program it and what is the problem or not. What is possible or not? So, this large curiosity for almost everything what is tech, that helps a lot.
Paul: Yes, absolutely. I’m asking, would you agree that most people who would approach that problem of saying, I want a pen that when somebody makes a mistake, notifies them of that? They wouldn’t know where to start, let alone to think it was possible.
Falk: I would agree on, some people, they believe it’s not possible. We have people surrounding us. They have maybe not a clue. They don’t know IoT stuff. They don’t know to program. They will say — I don’t know.
Most people though start somewhere into combining things. And there is a second component in innovation. Only combining what is there not always leads you to something. Most of the competitors actually start by camera because it’s existing already. It proves it’s possible, and then you will start constructing your product around these. But I go from the different perspective. I said, “What is the optimal product? And how can I reach it?”
So, I challenge the current state and change it and say, “No, I need a different way.” This is exactly what I do now. I have a huge software project, and I said to everybody, “Guys, we don’t work like everybody work, because if you do it, we actually spent the last part of the line like everybody do.” And also develop ten years. This time we don’t have. We need to be somehow different. I challenge the state also. Not reinventing everything. But I ask twice, “Is this what is existing the right way? Or there is maybe shortcuts? Or something be revolutionized here.”
And this was in the pen exactly the same. I said, “We will do it with motion tracking. If there’s motion sensors.” Everybody was saying, “No way. Not possible.” I said, “No, I have a feeling. I have a gut feeling it will work.” I was just researching a little bit about the resolution that these sensors already have. Is this fine enough or not? And roughly I could guess. I said, “I must be possible. It will be fine.”
So, but this was part of it. And most people, also by my experience, they will say, “Yes, it’s for sure possible,” and then they start to construct a product around the technology they have. This is maybe a small thing. What is the real innovation is not to do this. You just say, “Okay, what do we have? Let’s build something.”
Paul: Well excellent. We’ve been talking with Falk Wolsky. He’s the chief innovation officer with Innogate Tech. And we’ve had a great talk about innovation and there’ll be a lot of links in the shownotes to both his company and some of the things we talked about.
Well, thank you very much.
Falk: Thank you very much too. It was a pleasure to talk to you.
Paul: It was a pleasure to talk to you too.
This is Part 1 of 3 of our conversation with Falk Wolsky! Stay tuned for Part 2, coming soon!
On Episode 93 of The Edge of Innovation, we’re talking with entrepreneur Paul Rush, about the ups & downs of running a successful company.